Utah Reefs Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - reefbrite on rsm 130?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

reefbrite on rsm 130?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
pgravis View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: August 13 2008
Location: Ogden
Status: Offline
Points: 763
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pgravis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: reefbrite on rsm 130?
    Posted: November 07 2010 at 11:29am
Im wanting to add some led actinic supplemental lights to my rsm 130.  any one have any experience with the reefbrite strips?  Could i mount them just onto the bottom of the hood?  Or would that be too close to the water?  Is there a lfs that carries these?
any help or suggestions is appreciated.   
Thanks
PJ
See my house: www.eclecticvictorian.com
Back to Top
badfinger View Drop Down
Guest
Guest


Joined: May 18 2009
Location: Murray, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 2079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote badfinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 12:04pm
I think nick has them on his tank... he has the stunner strips, .... and The aquarium carries them I belive
Back to Top
Ahanix View Drop Down
Guest
Guest


Joined: February 11 2010
Location: Eagle Mountain
Status: Offline
Points: 1670
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ahanix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 12:06pm
The Ecoxotic stunner strips do put out quite a bit more light, (From what I have heard) and you will need something strong to combat the 6x39w T5's
Back to Top
badfinger View Drop Down
Guest
Guest


Joined: May 18 2009
Location: Murray, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 2079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote badfinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 12:16pm
The stunner strips are more for looks. The panoramic is the one that puts out the par. And the 130 has 2 T5 power compacts, 6x39 is on the 250

Oh and on mounting it, yes it would be too close to the water.... you can always hollow out the front part of the lid and mount it there
Back to Top
Ahanix View Drop Down
Guest
Guest


Joined: February 11 2010
Location: Eagle Mountain
Status: Offline
Points: 1670
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ahanix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 12:30pm
Originally posted by badfinger badfinger wrote:

The stunner strips are more for looks. The panoramic is the one that puts out the par. And the 130 has 2 T5 power compacts, 6x39 is on the 250

Oh and on mounting it, yes it would be too close to the water.... you can always hollow out the front part of the lid and mount it there



Are you sure? I swore that I saw 6 individual sets of t5 sockets in the hood of the RSM yesterday

Back to Top
badfinger View Drop Down
Guest
Guest


Joined: May 18 2009
Location: Murray, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 2079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote badfinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 12:47pm
Ya that was a 250... 65 gallons..... the 130 is the 34 gallon
Back to Top
bur01014 View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2010
Location: Salt Lake
Status: Offline
Points: 1435
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bur01014 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 1:47pm
Reefbrites are waayyyyyy more powerful than stunners or the panorama.....one reefbrite strip puts out roughly the same PAR as two ATI Blue Pluses with individual reflectors....go for it!  I would, but those reefbrites aren't cheap for a 48 inch tank...as for the panorama...outdated, not as powerful, and can have a spotlight effect...


Edited by bur01014 - November 07 2010 at 1:49pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.140 seconds.