Utah Reefs Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 2 questions on lighting
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

2 questions on lighting

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
xlr8r View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 15 2009
Location: grantsville,ut.
Status: Offline
Points: 392
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote xlr8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 2 questions on lighting
    Posted: February 13 2011 at 12:20am
First, what is all of your opinions/experiance with the Odyssea brand light fixtures? On AquaTraders, they are pretty inexpensive but I wonder about the quality.
 
Second: My tank is a 30 gallon breeder. Its only 12" deep. Would a 4 X 24w, 24in. T5 be too much for it? Right now I have a 30in. PC 130w fixture.
 
Thanks!!
When you hear hoofbeats....Think of a zebra
Back to Top
bfessler View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2009
Location: Lehi
Status: Offline
Points: 1708
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bfessler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 8:50am
I haven't used their new fixtures but their products have improved considerably in the last few years. I wouldn't have any problem using one today. They use a quality ballast now and are a great deal especially considering the lack of good quality 24" fixtures available. The bulbs aren't the best so you may want to swap them out in the next 6 months or so for better bulbs.
 
4 T5 lamps should be fine for your tank. You may have to light acclimate the corals to the brighter light. I had to do the same with my 4 lamp T5 on a 55 Gallon but now I have the fixture over a 50 gallon stock tank also only 12" deep and everything is doing great. 
Burt

An equal opportunity reefer,
I support all hobbyists and organizations involved in Marine Aquarium Keeping.
[email protected]
Back to Top
xlr8r View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 15 2009
Location: grantsville,ut.
Status: Offline
Points: 392
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote xlr8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 10:12am
Thanks Burt! I hac heard about low quality in the past. But I see more and more people use them. I think they are a great deal at only $65 for the fixture I'm looking at. Personally, I think some of the equipment we use is WAY over-priced, but we continue to pay it!
When you hear hoofbeats....Think of a zebra
Back to Top
Ryan Thompson View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2006
Location: Lehi
Status: Offline
Points: 3546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ryan Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 7:07pm
I know that I wouldn't use an Odyssea over my own personal tank if it was given to me with free bulb replacements for life!

Their customer service is a joke and their fixtures are about the same.

I am not saying you need to go out and get an ATI or Tek for your tank. I would go with a Current USA or Aquatic Life fixture LONG before I used an Odyssea.

Just go surf Reef Central for 2 seconds and see the junk that Odyssea produces. I used a Jebo (old name for Odyssea) about 3 years ago maybe a little longer. I wasn't impressed one bit with the light fixture itself. Cheap ballast, cheap legs, cheap reflectors and no cooling.

That $65 sounds great up front but add in $100 in new bulbs and you are at $160 for the fixture. Then if you don't cool the bulbs you are looking at replacing bulbs every 6-7 months. That cheap fixture just got expensive.

I would look into some PAR LED bulbs first.

But as Adam always tells me "I am FULL of crazy talk!"
Back to Top
vadryn View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: February 05 2007
Location: North Logan
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vadryn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 7:22pm
You can't trust suggestions from someone who's sig says "Tankless." Wink
 
If you are buying new, I would consider a PC light as well as the T5.  I have the Odyssea 150w MH over my 90g and wouldn't argue that they aren't as well made as some, but as you are also in the club of having to do the heimlich on yourself after seeing what companies charge Reefers for lights, I am totally with you on trying to find reasonably-priced alternatives.  Would I buy the Odyssea MH again?  For what I'm doing, yes.  $500 for lights is out of my tax bracket.
 
Go to www.AHSupply.com and read up on their retro PC lights.  I have bought their 96w lights and they are fantastic.  The UV Light Company's PC bulbs have internal reflectors, making their fixtures very bright.  Places like Reefgeek.com have more color options than most for the PC bulbs.  I would bet a 2 x 55w fixture would grow almost anything in your tank.  That's $70 + about $50 for bulbs and you have a high quality light setup.  If the price is the same, do the AHSupply PC light over the Odyssea.
 
Some sl*g the PC lights, but my experience is that these are VERY effective.


Edited by vadryn - February 13 2011 at 7:38pm
Back to Top
Jeffs_little_ocean View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: October 04 2009
Location: Kaysville
Status: Offline
Points: 869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jeffs_little_ocean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 7:38pm
I havent had any issues with odyssea stuff. Ive owned 3 of their fixtures. Yes they are cheap and kind of cheasy, but for the price its hard to go wrong. One issue I have with the new "extendable series" design is the way they sandwich the Led's right inbetween 2 of the T5 bulbs. Im sure the heat will kill the Led's lifespan, but I dont think longevity is aquatraders big selling point anyway. I had a 2 bulb odyssea fixture sitting right next to a 2 bulb aquaticlife fixture and to be quite honest, I couldnt tell any difference in light output. I say try it out, and if you dont like it, sell it on Ksl.
Life is good....right?
Back to Top
vadryn View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: February 05 2007
Location: North Logan
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vadryn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 7:46pm
I just reread your post and saw that you have a PC fixture.  I'll bet if you put UV Light bulbs in there you'll be 100% fine.  If you do that there won't be much of a "need" to upgrade the fixture (unless it's a really compact fixture that doesn't allow the reflectors to do their job).
Back to Top
bfessler View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2009
Location: Lehi
Status: Offline
Points: 1708
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bfessler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 8:09pm
I wouldn't worry too much about the passive cooling of the fixture unless you have them buttoned up in a hood that has little or no circulation. I've been running a 24" Glo fixture for 3 years without any active cooling and they do just fine changing the lamps annualy. If you're concerned about it just set up a schedule and replace one lamp every 3 months. That way you'll always have 3 lamps under 9 months old and it's a lot easier to buy one lamp every 3 months than 4 lamps all at one time.Wink
Burt

An equal opportunity reefer,
I support all hobbyists and organizations involved in Marine Aquarium Keeping.
[email protected]
Back to Top
SGH360 View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: April 04 2010
Location: Centerville, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 1786
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SGH360 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 9:21pm
Aqua tradrs PC and T5 setups arent the best. Honestly i would go for their MH setups which the 2011 model is amazing. it comes with T5 instead of pc as supplements. all of the bulbs which can be replaced with ATI. MH ballast can be swapped with ice cap. you can get a decent MH setup for a fraction of the price compared to Coralife.
Back to Top
badger126 View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2010
Location: Idaho Falls
Status: Offline
Points: 358
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote badger126 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 1:53am
I agree that the Odyessa fixtures aren't the greatest out there but they are fine for people who are on a budget. I too have heard about their recent improvements in quality and while I personally own a Current fixture, I have known a few people with the Aquatraders fixture over their tanks and they do just fine.

That being said, the biggest problem with PC lighting is the tendency for their light to fizzle the on the deeper tanks - the wavelengths from PC lighting for some reason doesn't do well with depth from what I've read and since you have a pretty shallow tank you should be doing pretty well with the PC. What's your reason for wanting to go t5? I like t5 better, just curious what's making you want to change specifically. I'm a huge t5 fan especially over MH, which produce too much heat and consume too much energy when compared to t5s.

Also I'd like to mention that during my research when I was trying to make up my own mind about lighting I learned that T5 bulbs actually have no need of cooling unless in an enclosed canopy - they have a self cooling mechanism in the labeled end of the bulb(don't ask me how it works). This is why the Current (have no clue about other brands) fixtures only put fans on one end of the fixture. So there is actually no concern when it comes to the Odyessa fixtures if they're not cooled. If you'd like my source on this I may be able to dig it up, but it's from the guy on RC who is generally considered their t5 expert.

I personally recommend getting the Odyessa fixture and just replace the bulbs when you get the extra cash - then you can customize the look that you want with your new bulbs, plus the new bulbs you get will have a much better PAR rating than the ones that come with the fixture.
Back to Top
badfinger View Drop Down
Guest
Guest


Joined: May 18 2009
Location: Murray, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 2079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote badfinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 7:47am
The spot on the labeled side of the bulb has the "cold spot"...the cold spot is the spot that needs to stay around like 95 degrees for the bulb to work properly. Which means that I would still cool that side of the bulb.

T5s are better then pcs for many reason.. first one is size PCs are like 7/8" and T5s are 5/8"... smaller bulb means more light can make it around the light, hit the reflector and back down to the tank...what is needed for a "good" T5 fixture is ballasts,reflectors,cooling and bulbs (I personally think in that order)
Back to Top
EvanB756 View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: August 04 2009
Location: Eagle MTN, utah
Status: Offline
Points: 164
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EvanB756 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 8:16am
I agree with what everyone else is saying. they are not the best made fixtures but they are hard to beat as far as price goes. I am glad I didn't spend the extra $300 for the other one i was looking at.  I own the 2MH and 4 t5 model and it goes over my 90. I have had no problems with it at all.

I would plan on changing the bulbs though, their t5/pc bulbs are pretty bad and they should be replaced in my opinion. Other than that though i say go for it.

oh and I would go with the t5 set up instead of pc.



90gal display w/ 30gal sump.
Back to Top
Ryan Thompson View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2006
Location: Lehi
Status: Offline
Points: 3546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ryan Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 9:16am
Originally posted by badger126 badger126 wrote:



That being said, the biggest problem with PC lighting is the tendency for their light to fizzle the on the deeper tanks - the wavelengths from PC lighting for some reason doesn't do well with depth from what I've read and since you have a pretty shallow tank you should be doing pretty well with the PC. What's your reason for wanting to go t5? I like t5 better, just curious what's making you want to change specifically. I'm a huge t5 fan especially over MH, which produce too much heat and consume too much energy when compared to t5s.

Also I'd like to mention that during my research when I was trying to make up my own mind about lighting I learned that T5 bulbs actually have no need of cooling unless in an enclosed canopy - they have a self cooling mechanism in the labeled end of the bulb(don't ask me how it works). This is why the Current (have no clue about other brands) fixtures only put fans on one end of the fixture. So there is actually no concern when it comes to the Odyessa fixtures if they're not cooled. If you'd like my source on this I may be able to dig it up, but it's from the guy on RC who is generally considered their t5 expert.



I am sorry but their is A LOT of misinformation in your statement that needs to be corrected.

First off it has nothing to do with the "wavelengths" from PC lighting as to why they don't penetrate water. It has to do with the reflectors. PC's are big and bulky and you can't wrap a good reflector around them. Internal reflectors only do so much on PC. An internally reflected bulb can't come close to to staying up with an externally reflected bulb.

Second, T5's need to ALWAYS be cooled. I can PROMISE anyone that if you are talking about Grim Reefer (The RC T5 expert) he will never, ever tell you to not cool T5. You can dig that link up all you want and I will post 50 different posts from Grim where he talks about how important is to cool T5 bulbs.

The "mechanism" you speak of is an item that regulates how much pressure is in the bulb. It all depends on how much heat the ballasts and bulbs have that will determine how hard the bulbs are run.

If you are using a spec T5 ballast it will have a thermal regulator on the ballast. How hot the ballasts runs, is what determines if the bulbs get the correct wattage. Over heating or over cooling a ballast, KILLS performance on T5.

If you over cool or over heat the bulb, it changes the pressure inside the bulb and the ballast will change what wattage it is running at.

To get the cold spot on a T5 to 95F you will NEED fans. No passive cooling system can accomplish this. Current's cooling system is pretty bad. It does not keep the cold spots of the bulbs at 95F. It isn't that big of a deal with Current stuff because they use cheap Sunpak ballasts that aren't spec T5 ballasts. They under drive the bulbs and cause sub par performance as is.

Giesemann claims that their passive cooling is far superior to ANY other cooling system on the market. Yet, if you measure how hot their T5's get, you will quickly see and learn that they are just marketing something and making up excuses.

Here is a post I pulled from another site a year ago or so. This guy compared the output from the uber expensive Gmann fixtures and his ATI. The results are pretty impressive for ATI and total shot in the foot to Gmann.

"Hi all,

I compared an ATI 8x39w to my mate's Giesemann matrix 8x54w. 

I know theres a wattage difference so the light output will be percentage.

control factors 
height 30cm / room temp 22c / we both used apogee quantum meter and sensor

We do have different tubes, but the light output is so different, I really don't think it makes much of a difference.

T5 needs to be warmed up to have an optium light output, it took about 2mins to reach 100% output, me mate similar.

The active cooling in the ATI is on 6w throughout this comparison

time ATI GM
5min 100% 100%
15mins 100% 87%
30mins 98% 75%
1hr 98% 53%
2hrs 98% 51%

Although T5 is a cooler option than Metal Halide, it doesn't mean it won't produce heat. This, I realised, will cripple the light output which in this case to 50%. 
I looked at the GM at his place and they do have a metal mesh for passive cooling, but if you look at the bottom, the reflectors covers all the gaps which means theres no way heat from T5 can escape, the only way is down and out. The Giesemann know this because theres no splash guard!! This makes the metal mesh useful only for cooling the internal ballast. 
I'm not bad mouthing Giesemann, I really like their T5 lamps and the razor units. But I'm just angry that my mate spent a fortune on this, which proves to be doing half of what it suppose to do!!"

Here is another good link if you really want to see what cooling T5's will do.


Hope that clears things up for some people.


Back to Top
badger126 View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2010
Location: Idaho Falls
Status: Offline
Points: 358
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote badger126 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 10:30am
Sure thanks for the correction Ryan, I was reading back and my misinformation about the cooling came from posts he's made about not adding another fan to the opposite side of a  fixture like the current fixtures(that have a fan on only one side). 
Back to Top
Mark Peterson View Drop Down
Paid Member
Paid Member
Avatar

Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mark Peterson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 10:45am
Originally posted by xlr8r xlr8r wrote:

Right now I have a 30in. PC 130w fixture.
I'd love to get that fixture when you don't need it anymore. I'd prefer a trade but will also pay cash.
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:
www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244
Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member
Back to Top
xlr8r View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 15 2009
Location: grantsville,ut.
Status: Offline
Points: 392
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote xlr8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2011 at 5:42pm
My main reasons for wanting to change lighting are to get some flexability. My options are limited with my PC. With a 4 bulb fixture I can mix and match. Plus it gives me more options for coral. I also feel a 4 bulb fixture will spread the light out over my tank a little better.
 
I guess asking about Odyssea's quality was a lot like asking about Chevys quality or Fords qualityLOL.
 
Mark, if I make a change, I'll call you first!!
When you hear hoofbeats....Think of a zebra
Back to Top
Mark Peterson View Drop Down
Paid Member
Paid Member
Avatar

Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mark Peterson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 4:39pm
Thanks. Smile
Maybe I'm shooting myself in the foot, but there may be more options with your 2 tube PC fixture than you realize.
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:
www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244
Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.313 seconds.