| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: closed loop Posted: February 16 2005 at 9:48am |
|
I am thinking of doing a closed loop. I would like to know if there is anything anyone has done that has been unsucessful and if there is anything I should avoid. I know the idea of the closed loop is simple enough but there are always a few differant ways to do things some better than others.
|
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
WhiteReef
Paid Member
Joined: September 03 2002
Location: Magna, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 1014
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 10:56am |
My tank is what I consider a closed loop, but I must say that a key issue I run into is nutrient export, and keeping the slim off the surface. The tank is not drilled, so I created my own little contraption to make it work. I took 2" pvc pipe and made surface skimming device.
***I removed the image and comments to not cause confusion on the topic.
Edited by WhiteReef
|
|
----------------
Richard
Former 47G Column Reef, Magna 20" x 18" x 31"H
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 2:11pm |
|
Thanks for the help Richard.
I am thinking of doing my intake side like this onehttp://www.melevsreef.com/closedloop.html
Any ideas to make it better?
|
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
WhiteReef
Paid Member
Joined: September 03 2002
Location: Magna, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 1014
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 2:33pm |
|
The only thing I don't like about the setup would be the introduction of bubbles into the system. Other than that I really like the idea and might use it instead of my setup to see how it works. The issues for me would be the cost of the SCWD and the Mag5/7 pump as all the other items are easy to come by. I wonder if the bubbles are introduced because of the surface agitation or the intake for the pump?
|
|
----------------
Richard
Former 47G Column Reef, Magna 20" x 18" x 31"H
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 3:03pm |
Whitereef, I'm kinda confused on your drawing. That doesn't look like a closed loop to me. It looks like you have a pump set up to take suction from a surface skimmer. Is that right? Is the pump in the tank or outside the tank? Adding a closed loop to a tank with an existing sump/refugium/skimmer/ect, should not effect niutrient export. The closed loop is just to add circulation (external from the sump, but without powerheads stuck into the tank).
Bruce, set it up like the one in your link and you shouldn't have any bubbles (as long as you glue all the fittings). But I would skip the sqwd.
|
|
|
 |
WhiteReef
Paid Member
Joined: September 03 2002
Location: Magna, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 1014
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 3:14pm |
|
Yes it is a surface skimmer, and everything is internal without a sump or anything external to the system. So based on your definition of a closed loop, your right. Also the 29 gallon tank used to show his closed loop does not have a sump - at least he does not show one, but he does have a skimmer. Even at that the nutrient export would still need to be considered when designing or indigrating it into a new system, but that is basic to any setup of a new tank.
|
|
----------------
Richard
Former 47G Column Reef, Magna 20" x 18" x 31"H
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 4:00pm |
Yes it is a surface skimmer
Pointing the pump/powerhead at the surface of the water doesn't keep the protein in suspension?
Also the 29 gallon tank used to show his closed loop does not have a sump
I think it does, if you look at the picture that shows the back of the tank. You can see the closed loop, the HOB skimmer (Aqua C Remora?) and the overflow box for his sump. Regardless, we were talking about Bruce's tank anyway and I know he already has a sump/refugium/skimmer so he shouldn't have any nutrient export issues caused by adding a closed loop, at least in my opinion.
|
|
|
 |
Simple
Guest
Joined: June 20 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 235
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 4:19pm |
Hello everyone,
I would like to know if there is anything anyone has done that has been unsucessful and if there is anything I should avoid. |
IMO there is a golden area for the intake. You want it high enough to prevent a syphon disaster should something in the loop leak. You also want it to be low enough to stay active if the return pump stops. Assuming of course that youre using a return and overflows.
Melev's system is of course the basic idea. Personally, I don't like his intake. It can easily satisfy the above conditions, however I find it to be an obtrusive eye-sore. I used simple 3/4 cone shaped screw in strainers for my intake and I'm quite happy.
Hope that helps,
Chris
|
|
Ascultã tot, dar nu crede tot.
Believe nothing of what you hear, and only half of what you see.
|
 |
WhiteReef
Paid Member
Joined: September 03 2002
Location: Magna, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 1014
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 4:52pm |
Jon - the protein on the surface collects and pointing a power head at it does not break it up sufficiently, so the surface skimmer works to over come that. But a protein skimmer would also help eleviate the problem. Also I agree that if you adding something like that to an existing tank the nutrient export should not be a problem.
Bruce - which tank is it going on?
Chris - the system would never have a syphon problem unless the system has a break in it. I do agree that the intake is an eye-sore and using a strainer would be a better option.
|
|
----------------
Richard
Former 47G Column Reef, Magna 20" x 18" x 31"H
|
 |
Simple
Guest
Joined: June 20 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 235
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 5:29pm |
Hello everyone,
the system would never have a syphon problem unless the system has a break in it. |
Exactly, things go wrong. I'd rather avoid a disaster than clean one up.
FWIW, a small hole drilled near the water level could prevent a sphyon disaster. However this hole still needs to fall in the "golden area" to prevent problems when the return pump stops and the water level drops.
Hope that helps,
Chris
|
|
Ascultã tot, dar nu crede tot.
Believe nothing of what you hear, and only half of what you see.
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: February 16 2005 at 10:33pm |
[Exactly, things go wrong. I'd rather avoid a disaster than clean one up.]
Dont I know it
Richard, this is on my 125.
I got it all together and it rocks! I used the same intake design but I used my own return. I used all 1" and glued all the joints. No air bubbles. I also did not use the scwd.
Thanks for the help everyone.
|
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
jpiotrowski
Guest
Joined: September 30 2004
Location: Tollgate Canyon
Status: Offline
Points: 923
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2005 at 12:26pm |
Bruce,
After Anthony's talk I am giving great consideration to trying a closed system. I have a rio 2100 that I could use. I have some sea swirls in the back of the tank but as I am finding out I need more coverage, meaning I need some flow from the front of my tank to the back. Have you set yours up? Any problems? And did you follow the basic design in the site you addressed?
Thanks,
John
|
 |
lilbeag
Guest
Joined: May 16 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 46
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2005 at 1:23pm |
|
Bruce,
Why did you bag the scwd?
Thanks
Cody
|
|
Taylorsville
|
 |
Shane H
Presidency
Joined: March 09 2003
Location: Brigham City
Status: Offline
Points: 7921
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2005 at 2:38pm |
|
After Calfos presentation last night - I think a closed loop would be the perfect way to increase water movement. I've considered this before, but I think I'm going to try to incorporate a manifold of sorts. I do like the idea of removing powerheads from my display.
|
 |
jpiotrowski
Guest
Joined: September 30 2004
Location: Tollgate Canyon
Status: Offline
Points: 923
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2005 at 2:57pm |
Shane,
I was thinking the same thing. I didn't like the design of the cl bruce, has submitted only because it has too many external pieces, my luck I would have a leak. So, I was thinking about an internal setup but am not sure how to attach the SQWD to the tubing without metal brackets. I was thinking cable ties but would like easier access, plastic brackets?
I'm not much of a DIY'er but wouldn't mind giving a manifold a try. How does this work?
John
|
 |
jglover
Guest
Joined: February 10 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 576
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2005 at 5:55pm |
|
I just placed my scwd over my overflow the platic tubes fit so tight around the scwd that is doesn't leak at all. They are near impossible to take off as well. You shouldn't have a problem with leaking and if it is internal who cares if it leakes anyway.
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2005 at 9:23pm |
|
I did not use the scwd on the closed loop (1200gph). I am going to use one on my main pump ( 600gph) however.
As far as the plans I modified the design a little bit. If you would like to see it you are welcome to.
My opion of the project is, I am very pleased with it.
Easy to install
quite operation
no leaks ( kock on wood)
excellant water flow
lack of power heads in tank
|
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
jpiotrowski
Guest
Joined: September 30 2004
Location: Tollgate Canyon
Status: Offline
Points: 923
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 06 2005 at 4:41pm |
Bruce,
How many 't's do you have for your 600?? I have a rio 2100 that pumps 600 but I don't think that more than one (i just have a 90) would produce enough flow. With only one I am looking at nearly perfect (maybe a touch less than desired) flow. I am planning on replacing the rio (it's the pump I use when doing water changes) anyway so I might buy a larger pump and put it on my cl and add a 't'.
Shane, you were right. No need for brackets the tubing was snug enough!
The project took me about a half hour...the quickest and easiest tank project ever!!! So, if anyone else is thinking about doing this, just do it! It's fast, easy, cheap (except for an adequate powerhead, but we all have extras lying around anyway) and most important, turbulent water flow to the front of your corals!!
John
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 06 2005 at 4:47pm |
|
John, I have a total of 3 90 degree turns on the 600 gph return pump system. Seems like a good amount of flow.
|
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
jpiotrowski
Guest
Joined: September 30 2004
Location: Tollgate Canyon
Status: Offline
Points: 923
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 07 2005 at 9:47am |
Bruce,
The jury is still out for me on whether I'm happy with this flow. It seems to strike the corals fairly well but I would like to 't' it so that the whole top of the reef is hit. I thought about this last night...
Does anyone know if by placing an inline 't' actually increases flow? I'm worried about decreasing the flow but thought I read somewhere that this might eliviate some of the burden (speed up flow)?
I'll probably pick up a few 't's on my way home and try tonight.
John
|
 |