<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>WMAS Discussion Forum : C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings</title>
  <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; WMAS Discussion Forum : General Discussion : C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.03</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.utahreefs.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=10266</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : Moved the uptake pump do a different...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96397&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96397</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=392">unixnum1</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;02&nbsp;2006 at 4:59pm<br /><br />Moved the uptake pump do a different part of the sump and then let it run for a couple of hours.<br>This seems to have mostly fixed the problem.<br><br>Effluent is now:<br><br>Kh = Still off the top 16+<br>Ca = 480<br>PH = 6.8<br><br>So now I just need to juggle things to get it where I want.<br><br>Thanks all.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96397&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96397</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : on sailfert alk its actually 2ml...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96218&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96218</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=96">jfinch</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 7:13pm<br /><br /><P><strong>on sailfert alk its actually 2ml of water 1 drop oh kh-ind for the low resolution then multiply the value by 2</strong></P><P>yup, and 1 ml of water is "ultra low res" <IMG src="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0">.&nbsp; Just remember to multiply by 4 rather then 2.</P><P><strong>so are you suppose to test effulent differently?</strong></P><P>Testing the effluent of the reactor gives you an idea of how well it's working.&nbsp; You test it the same way you'd test your tank water.&nbsp; I hardly ever test my effluent calcium because I know it will track with my alk... it has to.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96218&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96218</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : on sailfert alk its actually 2ml...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96214&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96214</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1210">Tammy3770</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 6:40pm<br /><br /><P>on sailfert alk its actually 2ml of water 1 drop oh kh-ind for the low resolution then multiply the value by 2</P><P>as opposed to 4ml of water and 2 drops of kh-ind.</P><P>so are you suppose to test effulent differently?</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96214&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96214</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : For the alk test I only use 1...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96198&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96198</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=96">jfinch</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 5:31pm<br /><br /><P>For the alk test I only use 1 ml of effluent water.&nbsp; One drop of indicator.&nbsp; And titrate to color change.&nbsp; Read the alk value off the chart and multiply by 4.&nbsp; This saves on titrate (the kit will last longer).&nbsp; And I only use 1 ml for the calcium test and multiply the answer by two... I think the instructions for the calcium kit actually explain this.</P><P>Oh, and make sure you titrate the calcium kit past the purple color to blue.</P><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by jfinch</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96198&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96198</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : Ok, Test kits are Salifert. Tank:  dKh...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96188&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96188</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=392">unixnum1</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 4:57pm<br /><br />Ok,<br>Test kits are Salifert.<br>Tank:<br><br>dKh = 9.6-10<br>Ca&nbsp; = 390-400<br>PH&nbsp; = 7.9-8.0<br>Mg&nbsp; = 1400<br><br>Effluent:<br><br>dKh = Off the top15+<br>Ca&nbsp; = 180<br>PH&nbsp; = 6.6<br>Mg&nbsp; = ?? Didn't take it.<br><br>However, as I stated previously I think the problem is caused my mypickup pump located right next to my top off hose so I think that areais mostly fresh.<br>I was planning on moving it tonight and seing if it improves.<br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96188&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96188</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : wait: what are your tank params...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96179&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96179</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1210">Tammy3770</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 4:30pm<br /><br /><P>wait:</P><P>what are your tank params again?</P><P>and what are the readings from your effulent?</P><P>what kind of test kits are you useing?</P><P>help me fit my head around this.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96179&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96179</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : I deffinetly listen to John! Do...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96173&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96173</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=392">unixnum1</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 4:15pm<br /><br />I deffinetly listen to John! Do you think I want a&nbsp;<img src="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/smileys/smiley18.gif" border="0">&nbsp;&nbsp; Just kidding<img src="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0"><br><br>Actually I have been able to keep the CA around 400.<br>It is the Kh I have a hard time maintaining. I end up adding lots of buffer.<br>From reading the articles, it looks like I will need to start adding kalk while using the ca reactor.<br>Correct?<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96173&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96173</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : That is what I had thought. The...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96170&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96170</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=392">unixnum1</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 4:06pm<br /><br />That is what I had thought. The numbers just didn't make sense.<br>However, I had checked them twice and they came out the same. (for the effluent)<br><br>Thinking about it, I think I may have part of the answer, I justrealized that my top off pours right next to the pickup pump for thereactor.<br>So that area is mostly fresh water.<br>I will move my pump tonight and see what it does.<br><br>Thanks for the insight<img src="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/smileys/smiley32.gif" border="0"><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96170&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96170</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : I would listen to John. This is...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96168&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96168</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=63">ewaldsreef</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 3:56pm<br /><br /> I would listen to John. This is his area of expertice.<br /> Also before dialing in your reactor it is a good idea to get your calcium up to were it should be. I used turbo ca for this. The ca reactor is more designed to maintain ca rather then raise it. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96168&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96168</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[C&#111;nfused  about effluent readings : Kh up off the scaleCA 180 This...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96166&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96166</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=96">jfinch</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 10266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February&nbsp;01&nbsp;2006 at 3:50pm<br /><br /><P><strong>Kh up off the scale<BR>CA 180</strong></P><P>This isn't right.&nbsp; Your calcium number is bad.&nbsp; Your calcium value in the effluent&nbsp;has to be higher then in your tank.</P><P><strong>The Kh is high because the of CO2, right?<BR>Why is the CA so low? Because of the high Kh?</strong></P><P>No, CO2 does not measure as alkalinity.&nbsp; The alk is high because the media is dissolving and when it dissolves it releases both calcium and alkalinity.&nbsp; The effluent of my reactor is normally 12 meq/l (34 dKH) and 600 ppm calcium.</P><P>I'd recheck your calcium number.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266&amp;PID=96166&amp;title=confused-about-effluent-readings#96166</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>